More Pages: Mason Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69


The Dancing Meterorite
Get it if you can find it

Frighteningly real and embarassing as wellThe rescue part in the book was a bit abrupt and final...perhaps he could have offered more insight to the final rescue moments.
Read it! and you will see your next flight with new eyes ...

Writing that will stir your soul
An accessible book for kids about predators and prey

Book tips helped me save money . . .
Financial Fitness for Life

A Very Helpful Book That Prepares You For a Flat Coat
Highlights this versatile dog

Pop goes the...what?
Excellent

You've gotta love the gentle Franklin.
Franklin Goes To Day Camp

Well doneOverall, this volume is an excellent exposition of Spinoza's thought about God and religion -- and it has some very interesting features. For one thing, there's a full chapter devoted to figuring out just what Spinoza thought of Jesus -- a much-neglected topic. For another, there's _another_ full chapter devoted to figuring out just what Spinoza meant by the eternality of the mind.
I find Mason very congenial on many points. For my money he outdoes both Edwin Curley _and_ Jonathan Bennett on some topics -- especially Spinoza's views on the nature of necessity. He also beats the heck out of Yovel on Spinoza's relations to religion. And at one point he offers a gentle corrective to nineteenth-century-idealistic readings of Spinoza (especially Joachim), arguing that Spinoza did think it was possible to know things short of the Absolute. (I think, by the way, that this is both correct and entirely consonant with idealism as it should be understood; in my view the British neo-Hegelians were a bit vulnerable on this point.)
Some readers may like his approach and its conclusion: that there isn't any point to digging around behind Spinoza's words looking for theological secrets; Spinoza meant just what he wrote. (Which means, among other things, that he wasn't trying either to found a new religion or to undermine any existing ones.) Straussians will disagree, of course, but frankly there seems to be little reason to apply persecution-and-the-art-of-writing standards to Spinoza's writings.
A nice addition to everyone's home Spinoza library.
Excellent discussion of Spinoza's background and metaphysics

Ye Who Will Bless the Poor, Shall Yourselves Find Blessing
I don't know,

Mike Mason's Job is most profound
BEST EASILY ACCESSIBLE BOOK ON JOB TODAY